Lawyers warn of nationwide protest if SC stay order not vacated
From what you have described, it seems that there is a bill being proposed that would limit the power of Pakistan's Chief Justice, and that representatives from bar associations across the country have expressed their support for this bill. The article also mentions that the Supreme Court has made a recurring appeal against the 2023 Supreme Court (Behavior and Procedure) Act, and that unless this appeal is withdrawn by Tuesday, May 2nd, the bill will be enacted.
It is difficult to provide a comprehensive analysis of this situation without more information about the specific provisions of the bill, the reasons behind the Supreme Court's appeal, and the potential implications of the bill's enactment.
However, it is worth noting that any changes to the powers of the Chief Justice or the functioning of the Supreme Court should be made through careful consideration and consultation with all relevant stakeholders.
It is also important for the rule of law and the independence of the judiciary to be respected in any such process.
convention held at the Balochistan High Court. Barrister Salahuddin's statement raises concerns about the impartiality and independence of the judiciary, as well as the proper allocation of cases to judges.
It is important for the judiciary to maintain its integrity and independence, and for judges to be assigned cases based on their expertise and impartiality. If there are concerns about certain judges being favored or cases being allocated unfairly, these issues should be addressed through appropriate channels and mechanisms to ensure that the rule of law is upheld and the public's trust in the judiciary is maintained.
It is also worth noting that the judicial crisis, as Barrister Salahuddin has described it, can have significant implications for the functioning of the legal system and the protection of individuals' rights. It is therefore important for all relevant stakeholders, including the judiciary, the legal profession, and the government, to work together to address any issues and maintain the integrity and effectiveness of the justice system.
IHCBA Vice President Adil Aziz observed that the current government and the Supreme Court want us to have a judgment that no one will believe. Restore the public and lawyers' trust in the Supreme Court, he said.
Aziz said that if a person does not want to take his case to the judge, then why should the judge hear his case? Lawyers and Islamabad, along with Haroon Rashid and other lawyers, said they support their leadership.
SHCBA vice-president Arif Abbasi also echoed Aziz's sentiments and said that if a person does not want the judge to decide their case, the judge should not listen to him.
Senator Kamran Murtaza said no one is obeying Pakistani law. He said that the parliament could not solve the country's problems. He complained that no one in the world except Pakistan had given a decision in the Supreme Court.
A decision was also taken at the meeting. The full text of the resolution reads: "Pakistan's lawyers uphold the highest principles of the Constitution of Pakistan, which ensures freedom of decision and clearly states that the power vested in the people of Pakistan is exercised by their elected representatives. Parliament.
Therefore, all institutions of government should respect and honor others and their responsibilities.
"For nearly ten years, the Bar and the Bar have requested the immediate application of the Chief Justice's discretion in the context of the tribunal, the sitting treatment of the case does not automatically begin (and does not make counterclaims) so that all that power falls into the hands of one person, inevitably has led to abuse and arbitrariness, leading to allegations that some of the court judges pursue a political agenda. The 2023 Law, The meeting also praised the Pakistani Parliament's doing. The Supreme should take into account the interests of the entire organization (including all judges) and should not speak to a person standing alone as a freedom of movement control judge.
"This conference argued that the current division of the Supreme Court has led to ongoing legal problems across the country and conflicts in the country as a direct result of the refusal to establish a full court in the political and political sphere. He calls on all the judges of . to overcome the divisions, to overcome them and to come together for a good organization. and race.
"Similarly, this agreement calls for changes to the Rules of the Judiciary Committee ['EC'], which now contradicts the Constitution itself - because the current provisions (unnecessary) allow the Chief Justice to override the wishes of the Chief Justice." The majority of JC members continued the selection process, refusing to select a candidate for consideration and only consideration.
"Likewise, this Convention condemns the failure to establish rules and regulations and transparent and objective procedures for the appointment of judges and urges judges to pay attention to the principle of seniority as they always rise from the ranks of the Court of Cassation.
The basis of personal likes and dislikes is one of the main reasons why the Supreme Court and Supreme Court have dormitories and lobbies.
"Continue to ask all judges of the Supreme Court to consider the political jungle doctrine, and when the court failed to rule on law
, the Convention also called for staff to be retained (and provided for) in the Supreme Court without it in the smaller states, particularly Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Sindh. representatives) and urgently. Record all decisions in the Supreme Court.
-
"This Board condemns the slander and propaganda against judges on social media, the transmission of illegal messages between judges and their families, and the necessary investigation, prosecution and legal action in this regard to prevent such incidents from recurring. requests action. "
Aziz said that if a person does not want to take his case to the judge, then why should the judge hear his case? Lawyers and Islamabad, along with Haroon Rashid and other lawyers, said they support their leadership.
SHCBA vice-president Arif Abbasi also echoed Aziz's sentiments and said that if a person does not want the judge to decide their case, the judge should not listen to him.
Senator Kamran Murtaza said no one is obeying Pakistani law. He said that the parliament could not solve the country's problems. He complained that no one in the world except Pakistan had given a decision in the Supreme Court.
A decision was also taken at the meeting. The full text of the resolution reads: "Pakistan's lawyers uphold the highest principles of the Constitution of Pakistan, which ensures freedom of decision and clearly states that the power vested in the people of Pakistan is exercised by their elected representatives. Parliament.
Therefore, all institutions of government should respect and honor others and their responsibilities.
"For nearly ten years, the Bar and the Bar have requested the immediate application of the Chief Justice's discretion in the context of the tribunal, the sitting treatment of the case does not automatically begin (and does not make counterclaims) so that all that power falls into the hands of one person, inevitably has led to abuse and arbitrariness, leading to allegations that some of the court judges pursue a political agenda. The 2023 Law, The meeting also praised the Pakistani Parliament's doing. The Supreme should take into account the interests of the entire organization (including all judges) and should not speak to a person standing alone as a freedom of movement control judge.
"This conference argued that the current division of the Supreme Court has led to ongoing legal problems across the country and conflicts in the country as a direct result of the refusal to establish a full court in the political and political sphere. He calls on all the judges of . to overcome the divisions, to overcome them and to come together for a good organization. and race.
"Similarly, this agreement calls for changes to the Rules of the Judiciary Committee ['EC'], which now contradicts the Constitution itself - because the current provisions (unnecessary) allow the Chief Justice to override the wishes of the Chief Justice." The majority of JC members continued the selection process, refusing to select a candidate for consideration and only consideration.
"Likewise, this Convention condemns the failure to establish rules and regulations and transparent and objective procedures for the appointment of judges and urges judges to pay attention to the principle of seniority as they always rise from the ranks of the Court of Cassation.
The basis of personal likes and dislikes is one of the main reasons why the Supreme Court and Supreme Court have dormitories and lobbies.
"Continue to ask all judges of the Supreme Court to consider the political jungle doctrine, and when the court failed to rule on law
, the Convention also called for staff to be retained (and provided for) in the Supreme Court without it in the smaller states, particularly Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Sindh. representatives) and urgently. Record all decisions in the Supreme Court.
-
"This Board condemns the slander and propaganda against judges on social media, the transmission of illegal messages between judges and their families, and the necessary investigation, prosecution and legal action in this regard to prevent such incidents from recurring. requests action. "
0 Comments